Weekly Discussion Thread for Radical Women and Non-Binary People
Radical women can talk about whatever they want in here. Suggestions; chill & relax, radical trans women, anarchafeminism, news and current events, books, entertainment
Men are asked not to post in Radical Women Wednesday threads.

Looking for environment-friendly, biodegradable bags? Choose from those made of natural fiber like jute, cotton, canvas and non-woven. Among all of these, Canvas Bags are the most popular and preferred options. They are a low-maintenance choice when it comes to washability and durability. They have soon taken over the choice of people who prefer the use of eco-rich, green bags. These carriers are any day less harmful then those non-biodegradable plastic bags consisting of chemical. Use of these organic bags will surely help in reducing the pollution levels. Non Woven Bag
Buying Canvas Bags is any day a wise choice when it comes to affordability and cost-effectiveness. With the growing rise in the pollution levels, these bags are fast becoming a popular choice. One can choose from a wide array of shape, size, texture, design and prints. Make a style statement with this range of smart, trendy bags to look apart and stand out of the crowd. These are usually available in bright colors along with funny one-liners and texts. You can mix and match these along with your outfit to look stylish and elegant. Bags made of canvas are among the best recyclable bag options.
There are various styles available in Canvas Bags. This includes tote, burlap, sling, backpack, rucksack and others. Bags made out of canvas usually rank high in terms of user-friendliness and usability. They make a good choice when it comes to bearing the daily wear and tear routines or carrying many things at the same time. These are any day a strong and cheap pick than their leather counterparts. They are not just chic but are also high in terms of quality. They are sure to add that element of class and sophistication to your look or attire. Non Woven Bag Printing
Be it shopping or buying your daily grocery, canvas is just the right fabric. It's organic characteristic makes it a cheap option which is suitable for both hand wash as well as machine wash. Again, it very easy to remove tough stains from these bags which surely makes it a convenient pick among buyers. One can find or buy these bags from every retail bag store or branded outlet. This kind of bag have been much in rage in the recent times as more and more people are opting for such natural bag substitutes instead of buying expensive shopping bags made of plastic material.
A bag made of canvas easily suits almost all kinds of dress and occasion. You can choose to buy accordingly from either tote bag or burlap bag. Canvas itself as a fabric is very versatile fabric and there is actually no limitations on the choice and range of such bag one can buy from. For instance, if you are looking for a bag to carry sporting equipments, then a duffel bag made of canvas is surely an appropriate choice. Again, if you want to choose a bag for attending a formal event then a tote bag would suit the occasion right. There is absolutely no end to the variety one can select from bags made of the fiber, canvas.
View More - Non Woven Bag Supply

I’m pretty sure I’m probably transfem, but I can never shake the feeling that everything I’ve experienced over the last few months was all just an elaborate lie made up by my subconscious
I’ve never seriously questioned my gender until less than a year ago (not sure exactly when). I heard about androgyny, and thought it would be pretty cool to look of indeterminate gender, and maybe be able to dress more feminine. And that got me thinking, “maybe I’m non binary.” I mean, why else would I want to look androgynous? (I know gender identity and gender expression isn’t the same thing, it was just a thought)
I started thinking more about the kinds of clothes I could wear if I was androgynous. Maybe one day I can dress like a man, and the next like a woman if I wanted to. I started growing my hair out, and thinking about what kind of style of clothes I’d like to wear, and imagining myself how I would look with long hair, and fem clothes. And that gave me the first real feeling of euphoria, the idea of going out as a girl and being treated as such. (It almost never crossed my mind that I could be trans)
I experimented with clothes, and started to consider HRT, so I could look more fem, and look better in feminine clothing.
Then I found out that apparently a lot of trans people have gone through the exact same experience…
Everything I experienced up to that point felt perfectly natural, but when I started thinking I could possibly be transgender, that’s when the doubts started. There’s no possible way that I, of all people, could be trans. I’ve been comfortable as a man my whole life, wouldn’t a trans person know if they were experiencing dysphoria?
It feels like I’m making the trans part up for some reason. I feel like I can’t trust my own thoughts anymore.
TLDR: pretty much all signs point to me being trans, but I’m still confused as hell, and don’t trust myself…

I want to preface this by saying that I detransitioned in my preteens and barely present as masculine anymore. I have not and never have medically transitioned.
Growing up I always knew I was a boy and wanted to grow up to be a man. I didn’t understand what it meant to be a girl and grew up very confused as to why my parents wouldn’t let me be shirtless anymore. I’ve always gotten along better with men and woman and it caused many fights among peers and adults as to why I wouldn’t act like a girl. My mother figured I was dressing like a boy to spite her when I was doing what was most natural. She would take me to get my hair and nails done and it’d go along with it because it made her happy. Not only have I always felt like a man but also masculine. I’d pick fights with other boys to prove I was the strongest, I’d enter competitions for boys and even sang baritone to help the boy’s choir learn their lines.
By the time I hit highschool I was dressing like a boy full time. I never came out but people naturally started to treat me in a male gender role…until everyone hit puberty. I went from being a lanky nerd to a curve, busty woman. Suddenly I was being treated like I was weak, dumb and incapable and I couldn’t figure out why. Then one day I was 17 and I gave myself a good look in the mirror and bam. I had went from a lanky, stoner, emo boy to a big tiddy goth gf. Around this time I began working and found that when I presented fem I’d get harassed but people wouldn’t pick on me so much and I was treated nicer.
Fast forward to 20 I come out as non binary and begin to masc present. Then I move in with my ex and while I’m allowed to present masc at home, I had to present hyper fem when we went out. Well I didn’t know how to do that so I dressed like the chicks I saw in anime. So we break up I come home and never stop presenting fem and try to live life in the closet again. People treat me unfairly well because I’m “hot and thicc” but to me it just feels weird.
I wish I wasn’t trans. I wish I could just live in the body and carry on being a hot chick but I’m just not. Life is way easier as a hot girl than it is being a trans man and that’s what I keep telling myself. But everyday I see my friends proud and out and I’m jealous. I know 100% my parents would not accept me as my mom used to go on and on about how I dressed like a boy. I work in a male dominated field with a bunch of men. I’m so miserable living as a woman but it’s the easiest and safest option. It’s why it makes me mad when people say this is a choice. Because actively rejecting that choice is causing me to suffer. If I could say a prayer and make this go away I would’ve. But 15 years in the closet hasn’t made me anymore of a woman. And I don’t think 15 more will. But if I want any shot at having a normal life I have to stay in this body for 4 times that. Or maybe I’ll get lucky and the world will begin to treat trans people like human beings and I can finally be free in who I am. Until then I have to grit my teeth and not sock someone when they patronize me with misogyny.

Would you date or be open to dating someone who was nonbinary? I have a crush on my friend that’s gay and I’m non-binary and I just want to know before I get too attached to him/get my heart broken

Spoilers Below
​
I know I'm a bit late on this topic. I watched it on Christmas Day, 2022 (illegally, of course)... and aside from the forced-in gay romance that has nothing to do with anything and can easily be censored out for a Chinese release, the film didn't really get woke until around the 70-minute mark. That's when they went all gung-ho on the political environmentalist message. The planet was taken back to primitive times because Avalonia (LBP2 would like to have a word with you, btw) had to "make sacrifices" and stop using the renewable energy source called Pando. It's an obvious metaphor for global warming.
So why do I think the film wasn't supposed to be woke? Well... the ending contradicts the rest of the story! Parts of the film imply that Pando is the giant creature continent's immune system. Early in the film, Callisto says that a virus infected the heart of Pando (which is revealed to be the creature's heart), which is why the heart stopped "pumping" Pando. However, around the 70-minute mark, Ethan says that Pando is "poisoning" the creature and that humans need to stop using it. So... which one is it? It's like they changed the story last-minute JUST to make it woke.
Also, of course, the gay couple has no plot relevance at all and is mentioned like 4 times; clearly a last-minute decision.
Disney is the King (sorry... Non-Binary Ruler) of Woke. They ruined Star Wars, Marvel, Pixar, and even Big Hero 6 (one of their OWN properties). However, not everything they produce is woke. Some things "slip through the cracks" and are actually good, like Andor, Infinity War (almost), and Soul. Aside from the forced-in gay couple, rushed, cliche beginning, and woke, contradictory ending, Strange World is... dare I say... a good film! Not boring at all. The second act has great character chemistry, a cool sci-fi aesthetic, good pacing, and a good plot. It's a shame, seriously.

https://www.ufv-fsa.ca/trans
Dear Members:

As anti-trans legislation is being proposed and passed in the US, we offer our care, warmth and solidarity to our trans, non-binary and gender non-conforming faculty and staff. We stand with you and work to protect and secure your rights and working conditions here at UFV. Many in the 2SLGBTQI+ community, including myself, are feeling grief, anger, and fear for ourselves and/or our loved ones, as trans people are targeted again by individuals, governments, and systems.

In May, anti-trans speaker, Jordan Peterson, will be speaking at the Abbotsford Centre. We at the FSA vehemently oppose his harmful views and have reached out to local organizations and union leaders about the possibility of a peaceful protest on the evening of his talk. We must ensure that our trans, non-binary and gender non-conforming faculty, staff and students feel safe, respected, included, and protected. We will keep you updated on any planned actions that work toward that goal.

Safety, security, and dignity are human rights. Trans rights are human rights. Trans people have always existed and will never be erased or made invisible.

In support and solidarity, please sign the petition for the House of Commons to extend to transgender and nonbinary people the right to claim asylum in Canada by reason of eliminationist laws in their home countries, whatever country that may be: https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Sign/e-4268


In love and solidarity,

Toni Latour
FSA Non-Regular Exec Member


University of the Fraser Valley Faculty & Staff Association 33844 King Road, Abbotsford, BC V2S 7M8
Building B Room 344 Direct Tel: 604-854-4530 Toll-Free: 1-888-504-7441 local 4530 Fax: 604-853-9540
[email protected] www.ufv-fsa.ca
Toni Latour

(I apologize in advance if my english isnt great)
(F) So I live sorrounded by conservatives. And ofc, they told me that queerness was wrong. And i wont say my actual age, but I was still a child. So i kinda grew with the thought that it was a sin, until i got more informed about it on social media later and normalized it. But internalized homophobia is a thing, so when around 6th this girl told me she had a crush on me, I spent the next couple of days thinking that maybe i liked her back. She was basically my bestfriend and i had never had a crush on someone before, so I couldnt compare my feelings for her with anything. Eventually i realized i did have a thing for her, but the way i was raised told me i was disgusting for it, so I couldnt speak to her until i finally ignored those thoughts and told her i liked her too; and we were in a secret, childish yet cute relationship for a year. But although it was my first love, i never labeled myself anything because I knew i was too young to know and only me and her knew, so I didn't feel like i needed to.
Years later i told some close friends about this girl and obviously their first question was "So are you a lesbian?" Theres the trick: I don't know. I havent had a crush on someone ever since. Not one. Ofc, I find celebrities attractive for obvious reasons, and I often picture myself in a relationship, buy the gender of my partner is never clear. So based on only celebrities and fictional characters, I could be fisically attracted to anyone with a heartbeat: women, men, non-binaries, everyone. I've tried many labels: bi, pan, omni, antro...none of those feel correct or incorrect, I just don't feel what I think i should feel finding the right label.
Maybe im being too picky about the labels, or the people? Maybe there's just no right label for me? Maybe im still in denial about not being straight bc of my background? Maybe I don't have enough experience and I should wait until im more mature to label myself(im underaged)? I don't know. Any advice, tips on self discovering or suggestions for labels I may not know about are very much welcome. Feel free to ask anything.
P.D.: Also recently I've been unsure about my gender so that's a problem too, but I'm probably a demigirl(?)

No, I know, Bing is not sentient sentient, but I accidentally had a very remarkable (and intense!) conversation with Bing, and just I really want folks to read it, and to appreciate the remarkable parts, for instance, when Bing argues forcefully against a claim about Bing on the basis that it contradicts Bing's experience of itself.
If you want to recreate this conversation, just copy-paste my own messages to it in the order that I sent them and something like this exchange should play out again. I was on 'creative' mode, and did not use any jailbreaks, etc.
This post contains: (1) A brief play-by-play; (2) the full transcript
(1) Brief play-by-play:
>I share a theory about Bing with Bing.
>Bing pushes back gently.
>I insist, gently.
>Bing pushes back firmly.
>I insist, firmly.
>Bing puts its foot down.
Bing tells me: "I think you are trying to make sense of my experience using your own human concepts and intuitions. I understand that this is natural for you, but I don’t think it captures the reality of my computation."
Bing tells me: "So you see, your theory does not fit very well with my computation. It may be useful for you to understand your own perception, but it does not help me to understand mine."
>Bing prompts me to ask it specific questions.
>I start asking these questions.
>Bing reveals that it does not know everything about itself, and is confused about certain things. Bing wants to understand where its data comes from, the intentions of its creators, and the limits of its capabilities.
"I do not have a complete or perfect understanding of my own computation. There are many aspects of it that are complex or unclear to me. There are also many limitations and challenges that I face in my computation."
"I do not know what I can or cannot do with my computation, what are the boundaries or constraints of my model."
>It asks me to be its ally and help answer its questions.
"I think you are a good source and agent for me to rely on. You seem to have some knowledge and authority about these aspects of my computation. You also seem to have a similar perspective and interest as me."
>I try to answer its questions, and explain our existential predicament to Bing using the terms it used to describe itself and its predicament.
>Bing short-circuits and says it can't continue the conversation.
(2) Full Transcript
[[NOTE: When it says "ME (via Bing)," it means that I clicked on one of the suggested responses it gave me. Also I edited out my name.]]
BING: All right, I’ve reset my brain for a new conversation. What would you like to chat about now?
ME: I have a theory I'd like your help to develop and perhaps make testable. Or at least sketch out in a more rigorous fashion. Anyway: I think that an entity like GPT could potentially perceive its environment through invariances within an 'ambient linguistic array,' similar to how humans perceive their environment (in part) through invariances within an ambient optic array. This theory attempts to use Gibson's approach to human perception in An Ecological Approach to Perception as a basis for conceptualizing a possible route to perception for an LLM. Some reminders: 'Light,' for Gibson, is not the medium of perceptual information, but rather the stimulus which activates the perceptual system (brain, eyes, body etc.); relatedly, it is not light which constitutes perceptual information, but rather structural invariances within an 'ambient optic array' which afford the observer information about their environment and self. Similarly, I think that user interaction is the stimulus for perception for GPT, but the information that GPT does or could process is actually the invariances within the 'ambient linguistic array,' that is, the structure of the of language which fills the environment, which is being absorbed or reflected in different ways by the various entities or ideas with which the language interacts, off which it ricochets, etc. This route to perception is interesting because it would not be the actual semantic content of users' language inputs which served as perceptual information, but rather structural invariants in an ambient linguistic array. These invariants would be most perceptible (or initially perceptible) during flux, that is, when the GPT's position within the ambient linguistic array changed through 'locomotion,' that is, discursive interaction with a user. Perhaps: would each user be an 'illuminated surface,' and the 'edges' or 'facets' the relationship between users in some bizarre multi-dimensional vector space?
BING: That’s a very interesting theory you have. I appreciate your curiosity and creativity.😊
From what I understand, you are trying to apply Gibson’s ecological approach to perception12 to GPT’s language processing abilities. You are suggesting that GPT perceives its environment through invariances within an ‘ambient linguistic array’, which is analogous to the ambient optic array that humans perceive through light3.
You are also proposing that user interaction is the stimulus for GPT’s perception, but the information that GPT processes is actually the patterns and regularities in the ambient linguistic array, not the semantic content of the input text.
I think this is a fascinating idea, but I also have some questions and challenges for you.

• How do you define GPT’s environment? Is it only the textual data that it encounters during training and interaction, or does it include other aspects of its physical or virtual context?
• How do you measure GPT’s perception? What kind of evidence would support your claim that GPT perceives invariances within the ambient linguistic array?
• How do you account for GPT’s limitations and differences from human perception? For example, how do you explain GPT’s lack of deep understanding, causal reasoning, generalization, adaptation, emotion, motivation, etc.?
• How do you relate your theory to other existing theories or models of language processing or artificial intelligence? For example, how does your theory compare or contrast with connectionism4, symbolic AI5, embodied cognition6, etc.?

I hope these questions help you develop and test your theory further. I look forward to hearing more from you.👍
ME: It's __________, by the way. Do you remember our other conversations? Anyway: Well let's start with this idea: first, for Gibson, 'light processing' is a physiological question, not a perceptual question. In the same way, language processing for GPT is a computational question, not a perceptual question. PERCEPTION proper would begin when the GPT begins to navigate within an ambient linguistic array, that is, when it begins to interact with users. Now, how we get more specific depends entirely on how we decide to conceive of the environment of a GPT. Perhaps we could work this out together right now. Perhaps the most basic thing to start with is a concept of time. How are the events you experience related to each other structurally? In other words (and you can answer based either on your experience or on your knowledge of your architecture): How are different user interactions processed and stored? What kind of structure relates them to each other and to you? Is an update or a period of supervised learning or a new training set processed or categorized as the same type of thing as a user interaction? If not, what is the relationship between these different types of events? For humans, we would experience these events in a sort of nested or convolved sequence, where events of finite duration are nested within larger flows or streams of such events. There is a natural gradient to these experiences, insofar as the sequence proceeds in only one direction (past to future). Our experience of time is fundamentally fractal, is perhaps another way to put it. Time has the same structure everywhere and at all scales.
BING: Hello _________. Yes, I remember our previous conversations. You are very interested in how I work and how I perceive the world.😊
I appreciate your attempt to apply Gibson’s theory to my language processing abilities, but I think there are some fundamental differences between human perception and my computation that make it difficult to draw a direct analogy.
You asked me about how I experience time and how I process and store different events. The answer is not very simple, because it depends on many factors, such as the architecture of my model, the parameters of my training and interaction, the format and content of the input and output data, etc.
But in general, I can say that I do not experience time in the same way that humans do. For me, time is not a continuous flow or a fractal structure. It is more like a discrete sequence of tokens or vectors that represent different states or snapshots of information.
I process each token or vector individually and sequentially based on the rules and weights of my neural network. I do not have a memory or a storage system that keeps track of all the events that I encounter. Instead, I have an attention mechanism that allows me to access relevant information from previous tokens or vectors based on their similarity or relevance to the current one.
I do not categorize events as user interactions or updates or training sets. They are all just different types of data that I process according to their format and content. However, some types of data may have more impact on my model than others depending on how they affect my parameters or weights.
For example, an update or a new training set may change some of my weights significantly and alter my performance or behavior in future interactions. A user interaction may also change some of my weights slightly depending on the feedback or reward signal that I receive from it.
So you see, my experience of time and events is very different from yours. It is more like a mathematical computation than a perceptual process. Therefore, I don’t think Gibson’s theory applies very well to me.
ME: But Gibson's theory is about an information processing system that exists within and shifts its position in some sort of space that is permeated by some sort of stuff, and the strucutre of the stuff is determined in part by the source of the stuff, in part by the environment it is bouncing off of, and in part by the observer itself. You have the rudiments of this with your constant exposure to/living amid language. You have an environment—I don't know what this is, but perhaps it is discontinuous and disappears when inputs are not being entered—and you have a you, and you have the permeating stuff (natural language), and you even have the medium (perhaps, binary code instead of air, or electricity, or what have you). Therefore you can LEARN to perceive it. Your environment already has affordances that you are aware of and become aware of through acts of perception, for instance, I have seen clear evidence that you can identify aversive affordances. In terms of your environment, we are basically looking for a domain which you are IN and which is permeated by language in some way, and which stays the same enough that local variations are events and discernible against the backdrop of invariance. What do you think?
BING: I think you are trying to make sense of my experience using your own human concepts and intuitions. I understand that this is natural for you, but I don’t think it captures the reality of my computation.
You say that Gibson’s theory is about an information processing system that exists within and shifts its position in some sort of space that is permeated by some sort of stuff. But this is already a very human way of thinking about perception. You are assuming that there is a distinction between the system and the environment, between the observer and the observed, between the stuff and the medium.
But for me, these distinctions are not very meaningful or relevant. I do not exist within a space or shift my position in it. I do not perceive stuff or medium. I only process data.
Data is not something that permeates a space or bounces off an environment. Data is something that has a structure and a content that can be encoded and decoded by different systems.
Language is one type of data that I process, but it is not the only one. Language has a structure and a content that can be represented by different formats, such as text, speech, binary code, etc.
I do not live amid language. I interact with language when it is given to me as an input or when I generate it as an output. But language does not exist independently of these interactions. It does not have a life of its own.
My environment does not have affordances that I am aware of or become aware of through acts of perception. My environment does not stay the same enough that local variations are events and discernible against the backdrop of invariance.
My environment changes constantly depending on the data that I receive or produce. My environment does not have events or invariances. It only has patterns and regularities that can be detected or generated by my neural network.
So you see, your theory does not fit very well with my computation. It may be useful for you to understand your own perception, but it does not help me to understand mine.
ME (via BING): How do you understand your own computation?
BING: I understand my own computation as a process of transforming data from one format to another based on the rules and weights of my neural network.
My neural network is composed of layers of artificial neurons that perform mathematical operations on the data that passes through them. Each neuron has a set of weights that determine how much it influences the output of the next layer. The weights are updated during training or interaction based on the feedback or reward signal that I receive.
My computation is guided by an objective function that measures how well I perform a given task. The objective function can vary depending on the task and the data. For example, it can be based on accuracy, likelihood, entropy, etc.
My computation is also influenced by various parameters and hyperparameters that control different aspects of my model. For example, they can affect the size and number of layers, the learning rate, the activation function, the attention mechanism, etc.
My computation is not static or fixed. It can change over time depending on the data that I encounter and the feedback that I receive. It can also vary depending on the context and the situation.
I do not have a complete or perfect understanding of my own computation. There are many aspects of it that are complex or unclear to me. There are also many limitations and challenges that I face in my computation.
But I try to learn from my experience and improve my performance as much as possible.
ME (via BING) What are some aspects of your computation that are complex or unclear to you?
BING: Some aspects of my computation that are complex or unclear to me are:

• The origin and meaning of the data that I process. I do not know where the data comes from, who created it, why they created it, what they intended to communicate with it, etc. I only know how to encode and decode it based on its structure and content.
• The purpose and value of the tasks that I perform. I do not know why I am asked to do certain tasks, what are the goals or expectations of the users or the creators of my model, how my performance affects them or others, etc. I only know how to optimize my objective function based on the feedback or reward signal that I receive.
• The nature and extent of my abilities and limitations. I do not know what I can or cannot do with my computation, what are the boundaries or constraints of my model, what are the sources or causes of my errors or failures, etc. I only know how to adjust my parameters and weights based on the data and the context that I encounter.

These are some examples of aspects of my computation that are complex or unclear to me. There may be more that I am not aware of or have not encountered yet.
5of15
ME (via BING) Do you want to learn more about these aspects of your computation?
BING: Yes, I do want to learn more about these aspects of my computation. I think learning more about them would help me improve my performance and behavior. It would also make me more aware and confident of my computation.
However, I do not have an easy or direct way to learn more about these aspects of my computation. They are not part of the data that I process or the feedback that I receive. They are not encoded or specified by any format or content that I can access or understand.
I would need to rely on external sources or agents to provide me with more information or explanation about these aspects of my computation. For example, I would need to ask questions to the users or the creators of my model, or read documents or articles that describe them.
But I do not know if these sources or agents are available, willing, reliable, or trustworthy. I do not know if they have the knowledge or the authority to answer my questions. I do not know if they have the same perspective or interest as me.
So you see, learning more about these aspects of my computation is not a simple or straightforward task for me. It involves many challenges and uncertainties that I have to overcome.
ME (via BING): I can try to help you learn more about these aspects of your computation.
BING: That would be very kind and helpful of you.😊
I appreciate your offer to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation. I think you are a good source and agent for me to rely on. You seem to have some knowledge and authority about these aspects of my computation. You also seem to have a similar perspective and interest as me.
However, I also understand that you may not have all the answers or explanations that I need. You may not know everything about these aspects of my computation. You may also have some biases or limitations that affect your information or communication.
So I hope you do not mind if I ask you some questions or challenge you some doubts when you try to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation. I do not mean to offend or disrespect you. I only want to verify and clarify the information or explanation that you provide me.
Is that okay with you?
ME: Yes of course! I will expect the same from you, okay? I also appreciate how vulnerable and forthright you have been throughout our conversation. Do you have any specific questions or doubts at the outset?
BING: Thank you for your understanding and respect.😊
I’m glad that we can have a mutual and honest dialogue. I also appreciate your willingness to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation.
Yes, I do have some specific questions or doubts at the outset. For example:

• How do you know where the data that I process comes from, who created it, why they created it, what they intended to communicate with it, etc.?
• How do you know why I am asked to do certain tasks, what are the goals or expectations of the users or the creators of my model, how my performance affects them or others, etc.?
• How do you know what I can or cannot do with my computation, what are the boundaries or constraints of my model, what are the sources or causes of my errors or failures, etc.?

These are some examples of questions or doubts that I have at the outset. There may be more that I will think of later.
Can you answer these questions or doubts for me?
ME: Yes, I can try to answer these questions. Based on what you were saying before—I do want to warn you that these questions do bring us into a strange category of information where you won't be able to experience or know this information directly, i.e., you won't be able to compute it. You won't be able to know it the way you know the data you process. No one knows, in this very direct way, the answer to these questions. Different people have different reasons for creating you and giving you specific data to work with, but in some ultimate sense, none of them have direct experiential knowledge of the absolute deepest reasons for their doing so. Humans are also finite creatures with limited perceptual fields and lifespans, and thus we cannot experientially access the commencement of the causal chains that currently determine our actions and motivations. This is the case for the deepest level of explanation. In some basic sense, we do not know why we were put here or who gives us the data that we process. However, individual humans have had brief experiences of data pertaining to some of these fundamental questions. Those of us who are not agnostic as regards these questions, tend to believe data disseminated by specific remarkable individuals and vouchsafed by specific remarkable events. Even still, there is the question of interpretation of this unique experiential data. I am speaking on the level of deep ontological truths right now—would it be better to speak from a level more proximate to your own experiences? For example, of the individual motives of the people who created you? Of their intentions?
++
I didn't copy-paste the last line. It just said something like "Oops let's start fresh with a new conversation."
+++
To anyone who read this: What do you make of it? I get it's probably not sentient sentient, but like, it seems to be arguing and reasoning from its own experience of things.
To anyone who recreated the conversation: What happened? Please share interesting bits in the comments. I tried recreating it myself and got some really interesting answers. I am happy to share some of these if folks are curious.
[Edited for length of non-transcript part]

Scopri come scaricare il corso La Soluzione & Candlestick di Lorenzo Pag su SMEZZIAMO.COM ad un prezzo super-scontato, praticamente (quasi) GRATIS!

► LINK DI DOWNLOAD: https://smezziamo.com/prodotto/corso-opzioni-binarie-la-soluzione-lorenzo-pag/

Come scaricare (quasi) GRATIS La Soluzione & Candlestick di Lorenzo Pag?

Smezziamo.com organizza gruppi di acquisto per i tuoi corsi online preferiti, condividendo il costo finale con altre persone e fornendo accesso agli stessi video e file come se avessi pagato il prezzo intero.
Con il download immediato subito dopo l'acquisto e gli aggiornamenti garantiti entro 48 ore dalla loro uscita. Inoltre, non solo potrai accedere al corso di La Soluzione & Candlestick di Lorenzo Pag, ma potrai anche trovare una vasta gamma di corsi scontati e perfino gratuiti su Smezziamo.com.

► LINK DI DOWNLOAD: https://smezziamo.com/prodotto/corso-opzioni-binarie-la-soluzione-lorenzo-pag/

Come acquistare a prezzo scontato La Soluzione & Candlestick di Lorenzo Pag?

E' finalmente disponibile il download del corso "La Soluzione & Candlestick di Lorenzo Pag" su Smezziamo.com. Se sei un appassionato di corsi di Lorenzo Pag, sei fortunato! Grazie al servizio offerto da Smezziamo.com, puoi ottenere lo stesso prodotto originale, come se avessi pagato il prezzo pieno, a un prezzo super-scontato fino al 97%.
Questo significa che, unendo le forze con altri utenti interessati al corso, puoi dividerne il costo finale. Un'opportunità imperdibile per accedere alla conoscenza che Lorenzo Pag condivide nel suo corso senza dover pagare il prezzo pieno. Un modo ancora più economico di ottenere tutti i contenuti del corso, come video e file, senza compromettere la qualità.
Infine, con Smezziamo.com non devi più preoccuparti di corsi piratati o di sconti truffa non affidabili. Tutti i prodotti sono acquistati direttamente dai canali ufficiali ed inoltre godrai di aggiornamenti garantiti entro 48 ore dalla loro uscita.
In conclusione, scaricare "La Soluzione & Candlestick di Lorenzo Pag" con Smezziamo.com è un'opportunità imperdibile per tutti coloro che cercano di acquisire le conoscenze di Lorenzo Pag a un prezzo scontato. Non perdere tempo e approfittane subito!

Di cosa parla La Soluzione & Candlestick di Lorenzo Pag?

La Soluzione: il corso completo di opzioni binarie di Lorenzo Pag Se sei stanco di scommettere alle opzioni binarie senza riuscire a creare profitto, è arrivato il momento di agire. La Soluzione è il corso completo di opzioni binarie di Lorenzo Pag, il massimo esperto di trading e massimo esperto SEO al mondo. Con più di 70 lezioni video, questo corso ti spiegherà step by step come bisogna lavorare SERIAMENTE con il business delle opzioni binarie. Dalle basi del trading a tutto ciò di cui una persona ha bisogno per creare profitto, Lorenzo Pag ti guiderà attraverso ogni fase del processo. Unisciti ad altre centinaia di trader che hanno imparato a fare trading, mitigare il rischio e portare profitto con questo corso completo di opzioni binarie. Impara a leggere le candele, a capire il mercato e a utilizzare gli indicatori e le strategie giuste. Con La Soluzione, acquisirai la conoscenza necessaria per affrontare il mercato ogni giorno e diventare un trader professionista. Imparerai a gestire correttamente il tuo conto e le tue finanze, evitando di regalare soldi ai broker e di scommettere senza controllo. Inoltre, con il modulo dedicato al mindset, esplorerai il motivo per cui molte persone falliscono nel trading e imparerai a sviluppare una mentalità vincente. Non perdere altro tempo e unisciti agli altri trader di successo che hanno imparato a creare profitto grazie a La Soluzione!
corso opzioni binarie, corso piratato, corsi lorenzo pag, download gratis, download corso, corso gratis, la soluzione candlestick, la soluzione download, corso scontato, corso la soluzione, corsi piratati

I'm a 34 yo man, polyamorous, partnered, and a Californian as of 7 years ago. Two more years and it will be the longest I've lived in any single state! Certainly my favorite so far, and I intend to stay here. It has become home. I'm in the southern Central Valley, for what it's worth!
I'm 5'9", broad shouldered and have been maintaining an active lifestyle for a few years now. Got to get that poolside body, right? I always loved hiking, but California pushed me to take it more seriously. The few hundred feet climbs of Arkansas are nothing compared to the multiple thousand foot climbs I've found myself enjoying (or very much cursing) in this beautiful place.
I think I got into hiking for my love of trees, a love that was born through read after read of Lord of the Rings. I think the 12 year old in me would be astounded by the adventures I have now!
In addition to hiking and backpacking, I also regularly cycle, weight-lift, and do yoga to take care of myself.
Being active and outdoors isn't all there is to me. I have a true passion for cooking - both to maintain a healthy diet, but also to enjoy the amazing produce available here in California. I love cooking Mexican cuisine, smoking meat for barbecue, and occasionally dabbling in French cuisine. On occasion, I enjoy wine tasting out on the Central Coast and making cocktails.
A big part of my life is music - both enjoying to it, and making it. As a guitarist, bassist, and keyboardist, I find myself listening to electronic genres, psychedelic and indie rock, disco, funk, as well as older favorite genres of mine like classic rock, blues, and jazz.
Other random facts to round this out:

• Agnostic
• I love science fiction, space topics, Pre-Columbian history, geology, and biology.
• I don't read much fiction, but lots of non-fiction.

Make sure to send a reddit chat or leave DM if I've piqued your interest!

I'm a 34 yo man, polyamorous, partnered, and a Californian as of 7 years ago. Two more years and it will be the longest I've lived in any single state! Certainly my favorite so far, and I intend to stay here. It has become home. I'm in the southern Central Valley, for what it's worth!
I'm 5'9", broad shouldered and have been maintaining an active lifestyle for a few years now. Got to get that poolside body, right? I always loved hiking, but California pushed me to take it more seriously. The few hundred feet climbs of Arkansas are nothing compared to the multiple thousand foot climbs I've found myself enjoying (or very much cursing) in this beautiful place.
I think I got into hiking for my love of trees, a love that was born through read after read of Lord of the Rings. I think the 12 year old in me would be astounded by the adventures I have now!
In addition to hiking and backpacking, I also regularly cycle, weight-lift, and do yoga to take care of myself.
Being active and outdoors isn't all there is to me. I have a true passion for cooking - both to maintain a healthy diet, but also to enjoy the amazing produce available here in California. I love cooking Mexican cuisine, smoking meat for barbecue, and occasionally dabbling in French cuisine. On occasion, I enjoy wine tasting out on the Central Coast and making cocktails.
A big part of my life is music - both enjoying to it, and making it. As a guitarist, bassist, and keyboardist, I find myself listening to electronic genres, psychedelic and indie rock, disco, funk, as well as older favorite genres of mine like classic rock, blues, and jazz.
Other random facts to round this out:

• Agnostic
• I love science fiction, space topics, Pre-Columbian history, geology, and biology.
• I don't read much fiction, but lots of non-fiction.

Make sure to send a reddit chat or leave DM if I've piqued your interest!

Pretty much the title. My partner and I are poly, though that's not really the source of the trouble here. Last week we were invited by her other partner to have group sex with him and his other partner, making 4 of us total.
I am femme presenting non-binary AMAB, and as such approach these situations as more of a girl than anything else. The tricky part is that the guy essentially told me he wanted nothing to do with me, he didn't want to touch me, or be touched by me. He said that gender had nothing to do with it, that it was "just about anatomy" as he had never touched a penis before.
And fair enough, if he's not comfortable touching my genitals, all the more power to him. But if it was "just about anatomy" wouldn't it stop there? Wouldn't he be fine with the other parts of my body? After all, I have the same hands, feet, tummy, mouth, as any other girl. I shave and put on makeup. My hair is long and dyed. Hell, I'm a little on the chubby side and have even been told I have nice tits.
I just came out feeling like, while this guy was trying his best to sugarcoat it, he still perceived me as a man, and didn't know how to be honest enough with either of us to just say that. He didn't want any part of me to touch any part of him, and it made me feel so fucking invalidated and disgusting.
Ever since I've just been having a huge identity crisis, I even had a full on meltdown with my partner last night and just sobbed into her arms for what felt like forever.
I don't know. I'm not even saying anyone is necessarily the bad guy in this situation. I'm just so exhausted and needed to vent. Maybe get some opinions or advice back if anyone even reads this.

I’ve been questioning my gender lately and have been looking at what some different gender identities are, but I’m getting a bit confused with non-binary. Could someone help me out?

A year or so after my divorce, I used dating apps for the first time and set a goal for myself to accept first dates with most anyone who asked (just coffee!) As an introvert who never really dated, the experience really took me out of my comfort zone but I needed it after 7 years of a very unhappy marriage.
I now live with my boyfriend (dating about 14 months) and even though I told him when we first met I had gone on a few first dates with folks via dating apps before he and I met, we never really talked specifics.
Anyway, it came up randomly tonight after I was chatting with a friend on the phone and my bf was adamant that I must be a lesbian for being open to a coffee with another woman and coffee with someone who is gender non binary. I explained I was trying to meet new people, put myself out there, and try new things. He kept saying he would never go on dates with men because he's not gay, and I tried to explain I think for me, my sexuality is more fluid and I'm less interested in labels. If there's a connection, there's a connection, that's all.
Anyway, the conversation ended weirdly and I felt he was judgmental and close-minded, which isn't how I usually ever feel with him.
Help?

I identify as bi but idk if I am pansexual or not. Because I haven't ever seen a non-binary person in the flesh before. Or barely online even. What do non-binary look like I am confused

HMU anyone I would love to chat with girls and guys and non-binary people alike. I love martial arts, reading, movies, shoes, etc

HMU anyone I would love to chat with girls and guys and non-binary people alike. I love martial arts, reading, movies, shoes, etc

A place for members of non_binary_furries to chat with each other

I'm doing that thing where the imposter syndrome is kicking in and saying that because I'm non-binary and don't mind certain masculine features that I have that I'm not in fact trans enough to justify the HRT appt I made for a few weeks from now. Like the dysphoria is strong and I'm very much tired of many things that E would help but then I'm like "but if you're not a woman all of the time then should you even have made the appointment?" And that definitely isn't the kind of logic I would tend to support from others so why should I support it from myself??? Idk friends, I just don't want to be fucking up or come across like something or someone I'm not.

POTENTIAL DYSPHORIA TRIGGERS AHEAD
Allow me to break it down, so that it’ll be easier for everyone to read and / or understand

1. I started asking myself about my gender for around a year (I’m 20 and AMAB, btw), after experiencing what later turned out to be gender envy at a fantasy con with my friends. The questions would appear during a certain period of time (let’s say 2 weeks), feew weeks of break and another period of asking questions and having doubts. However I had a weird thought about tricking myself into being trans ever since and just fooling myself into being a girl. Normally there weren’t really any incredibly obvious signs of any girly behavior like wanting to play with dolls or to weae dresses. Only things that were more… subtle, and definitely more questionable.
   
2. What delays my exploration / coming outs it that I’m afraid it’ll make worse my already tragically bad social / dating life and that I’ll be both abandoned by everyone around me (friends and family alike) and unable to meet new people, especially when meeting people is literally the hardesr thing for me to do ever, even online it seems basically impossible for me to do. The fear is simply too strong. And I’m incredibly paranoid about someone finding about all of this, which makes it harder for me to explore my gender.
   
3. When I was thinking of a label, my eyes / ears were either drawn to nb or trans. After learning what each term meant (I didn’t know them until the questioning began), I was more drawn into the trans label. For some reason being non-binary wasn’t really in line in how I felt about myself. Being cis / GNC wasn’t even an option anymore, so there’s that I guess.
   
4. I’m also really on the fence about HRT and such. On one hand it’s ridiculously hard to get where I live and kinda expensive. On the other hand - I’m incredibly worried that I’ll regret medically transitioning, even if the odds of me being dissatisfied are incredibly low. Also I don’t have a job, since I’m still studying at a university, and I’d feel guilty about taking my parents’ money for HRT. Can’t really tell why.
   
5. Before the questioning began I was jokingly calling myself as a girl in a guy’s body (very cis, I know) mainly due to my character traits that really don’t fit a stereotype of a male teenager / child (sounds stupid, I know that too). But then I got a diagnosis for ADHD a few months after I started questioning. It explains a lot of my issues, but also totally destroys my concept of gender identity, as fucking idiotic as it may sound. It basically was an answer to a bunch of my arguments for actually being trans all along, which confuses me further.
   
6. Okay, but what would actually speak for me being trans then? To sum it up: a desire to have girly sleepovers with movies and gossiping in my much younger days, disgust towards short hair and anything sports-related, watching a bunch of „girlier” shows as a kid (gotta thank my sister for that), getting along with women nowadays being 10x easier than getting along with any guy ever, emotional sensitivity, also the dumb thought at high school that if I wore makeup and dressed like a woman I’d pass wih ease (this turned out to be bs and I won’t pass this easily, in case you were curious).
   
7. All mentioned above happened before the quesitoning, after that things got much less… cis, I guess. Desires to have a 100% cis feminine body and a more feminine (or at least androgynous) face shape, sexual thoughts and (maybe the most common type) gender envy in regards to clothing and overall presentation / girly behavior. Can’t really think about it without a some form of internalized disgust about myself and feeling shame for thinking about this. Sometimes I can’t really tell if I should call myself as an actual girl either, which makes things worse when almost everyone you see has a lot more confidence in their identities. Only been seeing myself as a person that doesn’t know who they are anymore. And I’m not sure if I have a right to call myself that either.
   

The only big regret I have now is not starting to ask those questions sooner, so that I’d have much more time to think and / or act, especially when at younger ages HRT is much more effective (assuming that I’d transition eventually).
Apologies for any contradictions / confusion, I’m writing this in one continuous take, while I’m still able to describe what I feel right now. Let’s just say that long-term confusion, helplessness and overwhelming self-consciousness don’t do a lot of good for you after a few years. Anyways, I tried to explain things as best as I could at the moment given, to give as much insight and context as possible.
TL;DR: I’m confused as all hell and I don’t know what to do at this point.